Webz.io vs Finnhub: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Webz.io (4.2/5) edges ahead of Finnhub (3.7/5) overall. Webz.io is the better choice for data engineers backfilling years of news for datasets. Finnhub is the stronger option for personal fintech projects needing news and prices from one key. The right pick depends on your budget, how much history you need and whether you need full text.
Webz.io vs Finnhub: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Webz.io | Finnhub |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2018 |
| HQ | Tel Aviv area, Israel | New York, USA |
| Team size | 51–200 | Not publicly disclosed |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | History back to 2008 and the widest claimed source count here | A 60-calls-a-minute free key covering company news and market data |
| Pricing model | Usage-based credits; pay-as-you-go or subscription | Free key; paid market-data bundles |
| Entry price | Pay-as-you-go | Varies by data bundle |
| Formats & SDKs | REST API, JSON, Python SDK | REST API, JSON, WebSocket |
| Typical uses | Risk & compliance, Media monitoring, AI & LLM apps, Research & academia | Financial services, Research & academia |
Webz.io vs Finnhub: overview
Webz.io
Webz.io was founded in 2014 as Webhose.io and is run from the Tel Aviv area by co-founder and CEO Ran Geva. Its News API claims 3.5 million new articles a day from 350,000+ sources in 170+ languages (per company website; independently unverifiable), and the same token can query blogs, forums, reviews and dark-web feeds. For developers it is powerful but not quick to learn: queries use a field syntax (title:, language:, sentiment:) and anything older than 30 days goes through a separate archive endpoint that reaches 2008. Each account gets $5 of free credit a month and SDKs for Python, Node and Java. The default rate limit of one request per second is the thing to plan around.
Finnhub
Finnhub is a New York fintech founded in 2018, according to CB Insights, with staff reported in New York, Mumbai, Sydney and Ho Chi Minh City. It sells stock, forex and crypto data over REST and WebSocket, and news is one endpoint among many. The free key is generous on rate (60 calls a minute) and returns a year of North American company news plus general market headlines, but it is for personal, non-commercial use, and low-latency news streaming is a premium feature. Official SDKs cover Python, Go, JavaScript and more. Commercial bundles are priced on the site, with All-in-One listed at $1,000 a month.
Features: Webz.io vs Finnhub
| Capability | Webz.io | Finnhub |
|---|---|---|
| Full article text | ✓ | ✗ |
| Historical archive | ✓ | ✗ |
| NLP enrichment | ✓ | ✗ |
| Story/event clustering | ✗ | ✗ |
| Official SDK | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming or webhooks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free access | ✓ | ✓ |
Formats and SDKs: Webz.io vs Finnhub
| Format / SDK | Webz.io | Finnhub |
|---|---|---|
| REST API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python SDK | ✓ | ✓ |
| Node.js SDK | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | N/A | N/A |
| WebSocket | N/A | ✓ |
| MCP server | N/A | N/A |
| S3/bulk delivery | ✓ | N/A |
| BigQuery | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Webz.io vs Finnhub
| Criterion | Webz.io | Finnhub |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Pay-as-you-go | Varies by data bundle |
| Pricing model | Usage-based credits; pay-as-you-go or subscription | Free key; paid market-data bundles |
| Access models | Free tier, Pay-as-you-go, Enterprise contract | Free tier, Monthly plans |
| Price transparency | Public price | Quote only |
| Price tier | Budget | Enterprise / quote |
Who each API suits: Webz.io vs Finnhub
| Dimension | Webz.io | Finnhub |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer type | Individuals to enterprise | Individuals to enterprise |
| Typical uses | Risk & compliance, Media monitoring, AI & LLM apps | Financial services, Research & academia |
| Example use cases | Building a training or evaluation dataset from a decade of news. Threat feeds that combine news with forum chatter. | Company news in a personal stock screener. University fintech assignments. |
| How you get access | Free tier | Free tier |
Webz.io vs Finnhub: pros and cons
| Webz.io | |
|---|---|
| + | The longest web-crawled archive among the commercial APIs here |
| + | $5 of monthly credit lets you run real queries with no card |
| + | Satire, bias and fake-news flags on articles make filtering easier |
| + | One account also covers forums, reviews and blogs |
| - | One request per second by default slows bulk jobs unless you negotiate more |
| - | The field syntax takes time to learn |
| - | Large contracts are expensive, with Vendr reporting a median annual spend near $237,500 |
| Finnhub | |
|---|---|
| + | The free rate limit is high for a no-cost key |
| + | News, quotes and fundamentals share one key |
| + | Official SDKs in many languages |
| + | WebSocket for streaming quotes |
| - | Headlines and summaries only |
| - | Free key is non-commercial |
| - | Low-latency news costs extra |
Who should choose Webz.io?
A typical fit: building a training or evaluation dataset from a decade of news.
History back to 2008 and the widest claimed source count here. Paid access starts at Pay-as-you-go. Typical uses: Risk & compliance, Media monitoring, AI & LLM apps, Research & academia.
Who should choose Finnhub?
A typical fit: company news in a personal stock screener.
A 60-calls-a-minute free key covering company news and market data. Paid access is quote-based. Typical uses: Financial services, Research & academia.
Decision matrix: Webz.io vs Finnhub
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You want to start free before paying | Both |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Webz.io |
| You need full article text in the response | Webz.io |
| You need years of historical news | Webz.io |
| You want an official SDK | Both |
| You are wiring news into an LLM agent | Both work through plain REST calls |
Use case fit: Webz.io vs Finnhub
| Use case | Webz.io fit | Finnhub fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk & compliance | Strong | Limited | Webz.io |
| Media monitoring | Strong | Limited | Webz.io |
| AI & LLM apps | Strong | Limited | Webz.io |
| Research & academia | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Financial services | Limited | Strong | Finnhub |
Verdict: Webz.io vs Finnhub
Webz.io (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice as a news data source. History back to 2008 and the widest claimed source count here.
Finnhub (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need university fintech assignments. If your situation matches that, Finnhub is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Webz.io vs Finnhub FAQ
Is Webz.io better than Finnhub?
Webz.io (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Webz.io's strongest advantage: the longest web-crawled archive among the commercial APIs here. Finnhub's strongest advantage: the free rate limit is high for a no-cost key.
How do Webz.io and Finnhub differ in pricing?
Webz.io: usage-based credits; pay-as-you-go or subscription, with paid access from Pay-as-you-go. Finnhub: free key; paid market-data bundles, priced by quote. Both offer some free access for testing.
Which is better for enterprise: Webz.io or Finnhub?
Webz.io sells enterprise contracts with negotiated volume and SLA terms. Neither carries licensed publisher content, so check copyright terms before republishing anything.
What are the main differences between Webz.io and Finnhub?
What sets Webz.io apart: history back to 2008 and the widest claimed source count here. What sets Finnhub apart: a 60-calls-a-minute free key covering company news and market data. They also differ on entry price (Pay-as-you-go vs Varies by data bundle) and typical uses (Risk & compliance, Media monitoring vs Financial services, Research & academia).
Verify all details directly with each API before making a decision.