Best News API for Developers

NewsCatcher vs Mediastack: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

NewsCatcher (4.7/5) edges ahead of Mediastack (3.8/5) overall. NewsCatcher is the better choice for developers who want clean, deduplicated news without writing post-processing. Mediastack is the stronger option for low-traffic sites needing a cheap commercial headline feed. The right pick depends on your budget, how much history you need and whether you need full text.

NewsCatcher vs Mediastack: head-to-head summary

Criterion NewsCatcher Mediastack
Founded 2020 2015
HQ Middletown, Delaware, USA (registered); team mostly in Europe Vienna, Austria (apilayer); owned by Idera
Team size 11–50 Part of Idera
Rating 4.7 / 5 3.8 / 5
Primary differentiator Summaries, story clusters, entities and geotags arrive in the response, so the processing code you would otherwise write is already done Commercial use and historical news from $24.99 a month
Pricing model Custom quote; pay-as-you-go trial Monthly request plans
Entry price Custom quote $24.99/mo
Formats & SDKs REST API, JSON, Python SDK REST API, JSON
Typical uses AI & LLM apps, Media monitoring, Risk & compliance, Financial services News & content apps, Marketing & PR

NewsCatcher vs Mediastack: overview

NewsCatcher

Most news APIs hand you raw articles and leave the cleanup to you. NewsCatcher, a Y Combinator Summer 2022 company founded by Artem Bugara and Maksym Sugonyaka (registered in Delaware, team mostly in Europe), does that cleanup on its side: articles come back summarised, deduplicated, clustered into stories and tagged with entities. Version 3 of the API covers 140,000+ sources in 50+ languages with more than 2 billion articles since 2019 (per company website; independently unverifiable), and a separate Local News endpoint adds a location and a confidence score to each story. Official SDKs exist for Python, Node and Java, and the company reports SOC 2 Type II and a 99.95% uptime SLA. The catch for a solo developer is price discovery: there is a pay-as-you-go trial, but production plans are quoted by sales.

Mediastack

Mediastack belongs to apilayer, the Vienna company behind ipstack and weatherstack, which Julian and Paul Zehetmayr founded in 2015 and the US software group Idera bought in January 2021. If you already use another apilayer API, the key format, parameters and error codes will look familiar. It covers live and historical news from 7,500+ sources in 13 languages, with filters for country, category, language and keyword. The free plan gives 100 requests a month, which a day of testing can use up, and paid plans run from $24.99 for 10,000 requests to $249.99 for 250,000. Responses carry descriptions and metadata, without full text or enrichment.

Features: NewsCatcher vs Mediastack

Capability NewsCatcher Mediastack
Full article text ✓ ✗
Historical archive ✓ ✓
NLP enrichment ✓ ✗
Story/event clustering ✓ ✗
Official SDK ✓ ✗
Streaming or webhooks ✓ ✗
Free access ✓ ✓

Formats and SDKs: NewsCatcher vs Mediastack

Format / SDK NewsCatcher Mediastack
REST API ✓ ✓
Python SDK ✓ N/A
Node.js SDK ✓ N/A
Webhooks ✓ N/A
WebSocket N/A N/A
MCP server N/A N/A
S3/bulk delivery ✓ N/A
BigQuery N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: NewsCatcher vs Mediastack

Criterion NewsCatcher Mediastack
Entry price Custom quote $24.99/mo
Pricing model Custom quote; pay-as-you-go trial Monthly request plans
Access models Free trial, Pay-as-you-go, Enterprise contract Free tier, Monthly plans
Price transparency Quote only Public price
Price tier Enterprise / quote Budget

Who each API suits: NewsCatcher vs Mediastack

Dimension NewsCatcher Mediastack
Buyer type Individuals to enterprise Individuals to enterprise
Typical uses AI & LLM apps, Media monitoring, Risk & compliance News & content apps, Marketing & PR
Example use cases Retrieval for an AI agent that should not see five copies of the same story. A regional news or local-risk feature that needs geotagged articles. A category news feed on a small website. Classroom projects that need commercial terms.
How you get access Free trial Free tier

NewsCatcher vs Mediastack: pros and cons

NewsCatcher
+ Deduplication and story clustering run server-side, so you skip writing your own similarity matching
+ Three official SDKs (Python, Node, Java) plus webhooks and S3 delivery
+ The Local News endpoint returns a place name with a 0–10 confidence score per article
+ SOC 2 Type II and an uptime SLA make the security questionnaire shorter when the project goes to production
+ It publishes a recall comparison against other APIs, though the vendor ran the test itself
- You cannot see production prices without talking to sales
- History begins in 2019, so long backfills need another source
- A small company is behind the enterprise SLA
Mediastack
+ Among the lowest paid entry prices for general news
+ Shares conventions with the other apilayer APIs
+ History included on paid plans
+ Short docs with copy-paste code
- 100 free requests a month barely covers testing
- Only 7,500 sources in 13 languages
- No full text, entities or sentiment

Who should choose NewsCatcher?

A typical fit: retrieval for an AI agent that should not see five copies of the same story.

Summaries, story clusters, entities and geotags arrive in the response, so the processing code you would otherwise write is already done. Paid access is quote-based. Typical uses: AI & LLM apps, Media monitoring, Risk & compliance, Financial services.

Who should choose Mediastack?

A typical fit: a category news feed on a small website.

Commercial use and historical news from $24.99 a month. Paid access starts at $24.99/mo. Typical uses: News & content apps, Marketing & PR.

Decision matrix: NewsCatcher vs Mediastack

Your situation Recommended choice
You want to start free before paying Both
Your budget is at the lower end Mediastack
You need full article text in the response NewsCatcher
You need years of historical news Both
You want an official SDK NewsCatcher
You are wiring news into an LLM agent NewsCatcher

Use case fit: NewsCatcher vs Mediastack

Use case NewsCatcher fit Mediastack fit Winner
AI & LLM apps Strong Limited NewsCatcher
Media monitoring Strong Limited NewsCatcher
Risk & compliance Strong Limited NewsCatcher
Financial services Strong Limited NewsCatcher
News & content apps Limited Strong Mediastack
Marketing & PR Limited Strong Mediastack

Verdict: NewsCatcher vs Mediastack

NewsCatcher (4.7/5) is the stronger overall choice as a news data source. Summaries, story clusters, entities and geotags arrive in the response, so the processing code you would otherwise write is already done.

Mediastack (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need classroom projects that need commercial terms. If your situation matches that, Mediastack is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

NewsCatcher vs Mediastack FAQ

Is NewsCatcher better than Mediastack?

NewsCatcher (4.7/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. NewsCatcher's strongest advantage: deduplication and story clustering run server-side, so you skip writing your own similarity matching. Mediastack's strongest advantage: among the lowest paid entry prices for general news.

How do NewsCatcher and Mediastack differ in pricing?

NewsCatcher: custom quote; pay-as-you-go trial, priced by quote. Mediastack: monthly request plans, with paid access from $24.99/mo. Both offer some free access for testing.

Which is better for enterprise: NewsCatcher or Mediastack?

NewsCatcher sells enterprise contracts with negotiated volume and SLA terms. Neither carries licensed publisher content, so check copyright terms before republishing anything.

What are the main differences between NewsCatcher and Mediastack?

What sets NewsCatcher apart: Summaries, story clusters, entities and geotags arrive in the response, so the processing code you would otherwise write is already done. What sets Mediastack apart: commercial use and historical news from $24.99 a month. They also differ on entry price (Custom quote vs $24.99/mo) and typical uses (AI & LLM apps, Media monitoring vs News & content apps, Marketing & PR).

Verify all details directly with each API before making a decision.